imtoken will never ask for your seed phrase, private key or verification code. Always review the address, network and request details before transferring, signing or approving.
imtoken

Network Guides

Use public chains, EVM, Layer 2, gas and explorers to understand network selection and confirmation.

On this pageCore concepts and boundariesPractical use casesStep-by-step checksCommon misconceptionsSecurity checklistOngoing management
Before you begin

Use a trusted device and network, verify the destination and make sure you understand the request before signing.

Core concepts and boundaries

To understand Network Guides, place public chain, EVM and Layer 2 in the same on-chain context. Use public chains, EVM, Layer 2, gas and explorers to understand network selection and confirmation. A wallet interface organizes network information, but balances, transactions and contract state are still recorded by the relevant blockchain. Do not evaluate risk from a button label alone. Identify the active network, the target, the expected outcome and whether the request creates a signature, approval or on-chain fee. Any page or person asking for a seed phrase, private key or verification code should be rejected.

Practical use cases

In real use, public chain often appears together with EVM and gas. A user may move from reading information to sending assets, connecting a DApp or calling a contract, and trust in the previous screen should not automatically extend to the next request. Separate verification into three layers: the source of the page, the exact wallet prompt, and the on-chain destination or contract effect. This reduces mistakes caused by familiar branding, time pressure or a sequence of prompts.

Step-by-step checks

For Network Guides, a repeatable workflow is useful. First verify public chain, then check EVM and Layer 2, read the request related to gas, and finally confirm whether block explorer matches the intended task. If the action is submitted on-chain, keep the transaction hash and verify the result with a trusted block explorer. If the action only creates a connection, remember that a session connection is different from a later signature or token approval. Stop when data, amounts or contract addresses are unclear.

Quick check
  • Verify public chain and EVM independently
  • Review Layer 2 and gas in the wallet prompt
  • Never share seed phrases, private keys or verification codes

Common misconceptions

A common misconception is to treat a normal-looking interface as proof that the underlying action is safe. Correct-looking public chain does not guarantee that EVM is right, and a familiar Layer 2 label does not prove that the gas address or contract is the expected one. Multi-chain environments make these mistakes easier because address formats, token names and page designs can look similar. Independent verification of the network, full address, contract and transaction status is more reliable than visual familiarity.

Define the taskVerify the network and targetRead the requestConfirm or stop

Security checklist

Keep high-privilege credentials separate from ordinary troubleshooting data. Seed phrases and private keys remain under the user’s control and should never be requested by support staff. Public information related to public chain, EVM or Layer 2 can often be used for diagnosis without exposing secrets. When gas or block explorer is involved, also review the spender, allowance, domain, device environment and selected network. Blockchain transactions are generally not reversible by a wallet provider, so pre-confirmation checks matter most.

Ongoing management

Ongoing management of Network Guides means periodically reviewing networks, approvals, transaction history and connected services. Use public chains, EVM, Layer 2, gas and explorers to understand network selection and confirmation. If a DApp or contract is no longer needed, disconnect the session and separately check whether any on-chain approval remains. If network rules, gas conditions or service status change, rely on current network data rather than assumptions from an earlier session. Security, confirmation time and staking outcomes should not be described as absolute guarantees.